From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Kyle <kyle(at)ccidomain(dot)com>, Forum - PostGreSQL SQL <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Best way to delete time stamped data? |
Date: | 2003-05-05 13:32:22 |
Message-ID: | 20030505133222.GA2981@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 15:26:21 +0530,
Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> an index on age(date(trxdate)) would make it faster ?
That won't work because the value returned by age depends on the time
the transaction started. If you want the delete to be indexed you
need to write it out the longer way.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | greg | 2003-05-05 14:32:55 | Re: roman numerals |
Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-05-05 11:41:39 | Re: Database server restarting |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-05-05 13:33:05 | Re: Indices are not used by the optimizer |
Previous Message | Reiner Dassing | 2003-05-05 12:16:27 | Indices are not used by the optimizer |