| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matt Mello <alien(at)spaceship(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <jasiek(at)klaster(dot)net>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: implied FROM |
| Date: | 2003-05-02 16:33:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20030502093219.K65288-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Matt Mello wrote:
> Tomasz Myrta said:
> > <cut>
> > Some people
> > said, that it is very useful inside update queries. The conclusion was
> > this behaviour should stay as it is.
>
> We should at least have the ability to change a PG setting to say that we DO
> NOT WANT PG to try to second guess us ('set FORDUMMYS = false', or
> whatever). In my mind, this "feature" is a violation of the spirit of SQL.
> I wish I was on this list for the "vote" everyone took on this.
Actually 7.4 should have an GUC option for this (enable_implicit_from),
see recent posts to -patches.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2003-05-02 19:03:21 | Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem |
| Previous Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2003-05-02 16:29:34 | Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem |