Re: Buffer Cache question....

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buffer Cache question....
Date: 2003-05-01 12:29:36
Message-ID: 20030501122936.GC9725@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:09:52PM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
> What about commit_siblings and commit_delay? I haven't really played a
> lot with those. I would think increasing the commit delay and the number
> of siblings should give better, but slightly bursty performance.

This depends very heavily on your actual traffic. If you have
primarily write activity, it is a definite advantage, because you get
a boost from ganging writes to disk. If your traffic leans more
toward reads, I find that increasing these settings is a net loss:
you just end up waiting for nothing.

BTW, it is tricky to construct a correct model load to test this,
because you have to model both the load and its distribution.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2003-05-01 12:38:18 Re: [HACKERS] Join Stallman and Software SMEs to refuse
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2003-05-01 11:56:08 Re: [HACKERS] Join Stallman and Software SMEs to refuse sofware patents