From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Buffer Cache question.... |
Date: | 2003-04-30 20:47:05 |
Message-ID: | 200304302047.h3UKl5j01004@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Medi Montaseri wrote:
> I am using PG 7.2 with fsync truned on but still need a more immediate
> write thru.
> Does PG uses the fsync (or open_sync, etc) just for the WAL or for
> tables as well ?
Just for WAL.
> I understand the consequence of limiting buffer cache but my application
> cares more about
> integrity than performance. I'd like to be able to write the data to the
> physical storage ASAP,
> or ideally 100% in sync mode.
>
> I have found that by reducing the checkpoint parameters I can write the
> data to disk sooner.
> For example
>
> checkpoint_segments = 1
> checkpoint_timeout = 30
>
> What else do I have to work with....?
PostgreSQL is already 100% reliable (pull plug and see) so I don't see
any value to changing those parameters.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2003-04-30 20:50:03 | Re: dump/restore to 7.4devel giving "[archiver (db)] error returned by PQputline" |
Previous Message | Erik Ronström | 2003-04-30 20:33:48 | check_foreign_key |