From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, ianh(at)tpchd(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Solaris |
Date: | 2003-04-29 14:09:42 |
Message-ID: | 200304291409.h3TE9gV18867@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
>
> >Actually, I thought there was patch out there somewhere. Anyone else
> >know?
> >
> >
> >
> It looks like Solaris 9 has this included in a libc patch:
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fpatches/112874
>
> However I think the solution chosen by the Postgresql developers -
> using qsort.c from BSD is the best one, as it *sorts* all the Solaris
> releases (its in your Pg source : src/port/qsort.c).
>
> In fact I wonder if using the BSD qsort for *all* platforms might be a
> good idea - it would provide cross platform consistency and possibly
> better performance (e.g. It was several times quicker than glibc qsort,
> when I checked this on Linux last year.... )
Replacing qsort() on all platforms has a "we know better than the OS"
feel to it that we try to avoid.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-29 14:11:19 | Re: Backend memory leakage when inserting |
Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-04-29 14:01:32 | Re: Error: No one parent tuple was found |