Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...

> > And actually, it looks like sequences have this same problem as
> > well, only things are slightly worse there: you have to grant
> > SELECT,UPDATE to a sequence to the public in order for those to
> > work automagically. :-/
>
> That's always been true though.

True, but while we're on the topic, I figured I'd give things a shot
in the, could this be fixed dept. Inserting into a view with a rule,
the resulting query is run as the rule executor, not as the rule
definer. If that were somehow possible, then it'd remove the need to
have a rule rewrite the (insert|update|delete|select) into a function
call running at the privs of its definer and writing the functions
that run at an elevated user.

-sc

--
Sean Chittenden