Re: Solaris

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris
Date: 2003-04-25 02:54:50
Message-ID: 20030425025450.GB9112@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:03:24PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I believe this is all *sorted* now :-) The issue was the qsort library
> bundled with Solaris - Postgresql now supplies its own. So Solaris is ok
> for Postgresql (I think quite a few folk actually use this combination).

It's still not all that fast. Better, but not what you'd expect.
There's something fishy with the SYSV shared memory management, but
I'm darned if I can figure out what it is.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

  • Re: Solaris at 2003-04-25 02:03:24 from Mark Kirkwood

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2003-04-25 03:02:53 Re: Question about performance
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2003-04-25 02:39:42 Re: ODBC & Access [Try 2]