From: | Andrew Overholt <overholt(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dennis Björklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TODO-list |
Date: | 2003-04-22 14:31:23 |
Message-ID: | 20030422143123.GA23411@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Any pointers to the work he has done ?
I haven't committed anything yet. I was distracted with some other stuff
for the past two weeks or so and haven't made much headway. I'd be happy
to work with you if you want.
> Is Andrew Overholt doing the simple case (alternative to the the table
> function we already have) or is he trying to solve any/all of the
> general cases ?
I was aiming for the general case.
> Is he doing also the <search or cycle clause> and depth/breadth first
> variants ?
I was going to add this in after I had basic functionality. It was
something that I was definitely going to put in there, but it wasn't my
first priority.
Andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-04-22 14:32:29 | Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-04-22 13:11:16 | Re: CLOSE command tag |