From: | Philip Hallstrom <philip(at)adhesivemedia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeremiah Jahn <jeremiah(at)cs(dot)earlham(dot)edu> |
Cc: | postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |
Date: | 2003-04-22 16:47:46 |
Message-ID: | 20030422094604.I12601@tigger.alkinetworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 10:31, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> > At 08:13 AM 4/22/2003 -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> > >That's the question...That 2 TB of data is nothing but documents and
> > >images. I'm under the perception that if that gets parked on a fibre
> > >channel disk array/ SAN the data will be pretty safe, and the server
> > >mostly replaceable at that time. Storage is my worry more than
> > >processing power. I don't think I'm on crack here...?
> >
> > How about backups? Backing up 2-16TB needs a bit more planning and design.
> The proposed solution here is to have the raid controller mirror accross
> the street to a similar system. At what point do off line backups become
> pointless?
I've always been told to ask the question -- what's your data worth to
you or how much $ will you lose if you lose your data? That should answer
the question on offline backups.
-philip
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeremiah Jahn | 2003-04-22 16:55:15 | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |
Previous Message | Jeremiah Jahn | 2003-04-22 16:39:13 | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |