Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")

Great. I think it can be made acceptable with little work.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Instead of tables and their indexes being on the same platter, you'd
> > > be able to put them on separate platters. Sounds like it would likely
> > > yield a performance gain to me...
> >
> > That has *nothing* to do with whether we name files after tables or not.
> > As Andrew pointed out, you don't really want people munging file
> > locations by hand anyway; until we have a proper tablespace
> > implementation, it's going to be tedious and error-prone no matter what.
>
> Just so people are aware, I'm getting Jim Buttfuoco's tablespaces patch
> from him again, and getting it up to CVS. I'll then see what needs to be
> done to it such that it would be accepted...
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073