From: | cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 |
Date: | 2003-04-18 12:39:45 |
Message-ID: | 20030418123945.8A42757032@cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Brown wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > Still, I've now tried a 29160N adaptor, and changed the
> > cable to a DPT one (both that and the previous Adaptec have hardwired
> > terminators). I've also removed the DAT drive from the system so the
> > only things on the SCSI bus are 2 identical disks and the adaptor.
> >
> > I'm beginning to wonder about my shiny new 2.4.20 kernel...
>
> That's a possibility. There's one other I'd try, prior to using a
> different kernel: try booting the kernel with the "noapic" option. On
> certain SMP systems, this has allowed the kernel to come up properly
> and see the SCSI adaptor (among other things), whereas without it the
> system would hang on attempts to access the SCSI device. Even if
> you're not running SMP, it may help your system's stability.
The "noapic" option seems a quasi-magical elixir for many sorts of ailments.
I upgraded a box to 2.4.20 and discovered that my NIC was no longer properly
recognized until I threw that option in. Others in my office have
/apparently/ the same hardware, and found they didn't need the option.
As a "fix," it certainly seems to fall into the "snakeoil/superstition"
category. While it often seems to have a useful effect, I haven't located any
actual explanations as to why it should be expected to work.
But based on the comments in the thread, I would concur that my suspicions
would be with the kernel as the most likely root of the problem.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc"))
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/nonrdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #82. "I will not shoot at any of my enemies
if they are standing in front of the crucial support beam to a heavy,
dangerous, unbalanced structure. <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-18 14:06:27 | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") |
Previous Message | cbbrowne | 2003-04-18 12:32:25 | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing |