Re: IN Qeury Problem

From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>
To: <maggon(at)newgen(dot)co(dot)in>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IN Qeury Problem
Date: 2003-04-17 10:00:45
Message-ID: 200304171530.45076.mallah@trade-india.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Yes its a very well known problem and is
already there in the TODO. Its going to
be fixed in 7.4 release the TODO says.

you can how every rewrite your query using
EXISTS which is faster.

regds
mallah.

On Friday 18 Apr 2003 12:57 am, Sameer Maggon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am facing a problem regarding the performance of postgres. I am
> concerned about the speed of the execution of a query when large number of
> entries is given in the IN clause.
>
> I have a Table with columns:
>
> FolderName (Indexed)
> FolderIndex (Indexed)
> ParentFolderIndex (Indexed)
> ...
> ..
>
> I have a query where i do a SELECT
>
> SELECT * FROM FolderTable WHERE PARENTFOLDERINDEX IN (38::int8, ......);
>
> If the number of values in IN clause is small, its working fine, but as and
> when the number of values increases the speed of the query is detoriating
> with a steep curve.
>
> How can this problem be solved ?
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Sameer Maggon
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Rajesh Kumar Mallah,
Project Manager (Development)
Infocom Network Limited, New Delhi
phone: +91(11)6152172 (221) (L) ,9811255597 (M)

Visit http://www.trade-india.com ,
India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2003-04-17 10:27:47 getting rid of "Adding missing FROM-clause entry...."
Previous Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2003-04-17 08:34:10 planner question..