Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: gearond(at)cvc(dot)net
Cc: Guy Fraser <guy(at)incentre(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
Date: 2003-04-15 19:26:43
Message-ID: 200304151526.43998.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 15 April 2003 14:55, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> It doesn't require norton to be installed, does it? Norton just slows
> machines down and adds too many useless bells and whistles for the sake of
> marketing.

Na, Ghost can be a standalone program. Ghost 2003 is killer; 2002 (which can
be had for cheap) is very good as well. I got mine with a motherboard I
purchased last year. (:-O). And I left it on list for this purpose: Ghost
can image your whole drive. It can resize Windows partitions. It makes a
good offline backup tool for PostgreSQL partitions, too.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-04-15 19:27:26 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
Previous Message Network Administrator 2003-04-15 19:18:56 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-04-15 19:27:26 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-04-15 19:24:45 Re: Are we losing momentum?