Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?

From: cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Date: 2003-04-14 20:56:45
Message-ID: 20030414205645.17BCC5AF21@cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 10:43:06PM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Does anybody have any idea how Oracle RAC does it ?
>
> According to some marketing literature I saw, it was licensed
> technology; it was supposed to be related to VMS. More details I
> don't have, though.

That would fit perfectly with it having been part of the purchase of Rdb
from Digital... There might well be some "harvestable" Rdb information
out there somewhere...

http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/lomet92private.html

(note that (Rdb != /RDB) && (Rdb != Rand RDB); there's an unfortunate
preponderance of "things called RDB")
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/rdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #15. "I will never employ any device with a
digital countdown. If I find that such a device is absolutely
unavoidable, I will set it to activate when the counter reaches 117
and the hero is just putting his plan into operation."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 21:23:17 Re: internal time format
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-04-14 20:51:52 Re: undefined reference to `is_absolute_path'