From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on a Cluster |
Date: | 2003-04-14 19:17:26 |
Message-ID: | 20030414191726.GE14475@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 11:31:03PM +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> This is what we are planning:
>
>
> +---------------+
> + Storage +
> + Area +
> + Network +
> +---------------+
> +
> +
> -----------------
> | |
> Master Server 2nd Master
> with eRServer Server
> for load balancing
> So let's say we want to do some operation on the database, located at SAN.
> When the 1st server wants to update a row, it will lock it. What happens
> when the second server wants to access the same row? Does 1st server
> "broadcast" that it has locked the row?
This suggests you misunderstand how eRServer and PostgreSQL work.
There's no such thing as a "2d master". It's impossible (well,
unless the eRServer folks have done something they haven't told the
rest of us about).
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-04-14 19:25:47 | Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-04-14 19:16:42 | Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-14 20:42:30 | Re: undefined reference to `is_absolute_path' |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-04-14 18:57:47 | Re: MySQL and RHDB news; 8.0 troll |