Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit
Date: 2003-04-14 19:46:24
Message-ID: 200304141346.24652.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday April 14 2003 1:16, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> I saw somewhere on this thread that there is no way to tell when
> something is committed. that really doesn't make sense, since postgres
> is a MVCC system. Doesn't the versioning automatically supply commit
> times?

I believe the context of those comments was regarding what information was
(not) available from within a transaction. Of course, commit ordering is
available in the WAL logs.

Ed

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 20:25:34 Re: Strange query optimization in 7.3.2
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-04-14 19:33:36 Re: Inserting a needed record before a select