| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, elein(at)varlena(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Date: | 2003-04-14 14:29:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20030414112852.F9001@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 23:38, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> > > Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> > > management, and revision history. I have investigated this extensively, and
> > > there are *no* production-ready, pure OSS, CMS for PostgreSQL running on PHP
> > > or Perl. I was looking at developing one with Andy Chase (based on his
> > > "SnapSnap"), but then he got a job and Zapatec announced the launch of Bloki.
> >
> > What's wrong with Bricolage?
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
> Actually I'm still waiting to here what was wrong with the current plan
> to move the site to the zope/wiki engine...
With Justin not driving it, was anyone going to step up to the plate and
do so? So far, only person step up to try and fill Justin's shoes has
been Josh ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-04-14 14:43:16 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Previous Message | greg | 2003-04-14 13:48:45 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |