Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Date: 2003-04-13 03:38:55
Message-ID: 20030413113826.T77445-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> management, and revision history. I have investigated this extensively, and
> there are *no* production-ready, pure OSS, CMS for PostgreSQL running on PHP
> or Perl. I was looking at developing one with Andy Chase (based on his
> "SnapSnap"), but then he got a job and Zapatec announced the launch of Bloki.

What's wrong with Bricolage?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-04-14 11:13:10 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-04-13 00:27:57 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants