| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Case sensitive order by |
| Date: | 2003-04-12 22:47:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20030412224701.GA31063@wolff.to |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 13:08:03 -0500,
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:15:41PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 23:49:12 +0530,
> > mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com wrote:
> > >
> > > > I want to do case sensitve sorting on a varchar field.
> > >
> > > the default ordering is case sensitive , what makes u feel
> > > otherwise , could u give some examples?
> >
> > That depends on the locale. In US_EN ordering is not case sensitive.
> > (Unless to strings are the same excepting their case.)
>
> Stupid question: would US_EN also result in where clauses being
> case-insensitive? I'd like that behavior, but am currently doing it
> using where lower(blah) = lower('search phrase')
No.
P.S.
I double checked the name of the local and it is really 'en_US'.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom | 2003-04-13 00:07:27 | lo_import doesn't works through ODBC ! |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-04-12 21:27:32 | Re: Backpatch FK changes to 7.3 and 7.2? |