Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Steven Singer <ssinger(at)navtechinc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit
Date: 2003-04-11 17:14:43
Message-ID: 200304111114.43734.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday April 11 2003 10:08, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Clearly a bug, but we had memory leaks that clear up at transaction end.

That seems like yet another reason for constraining the size of a batch of
transactions.

> One of the "leaks" we still have: Constraint trigger queue.

What is that about? Or if you don't want to re-explain, what would I search
for in the archive?

Ed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-04-11 17:38:58 Re: Problems with Initdb in WindosXP
Previous Message Pedro C. Arias 2003-04-11 17:03:54 Problems with Initdb in WindosXP