From: | cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? |
Date: | 2003-04-03 12:54:13 |
Message-ID: | 20030403125413.CB5E158C03@cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I have been planning to "test" the whole thing with a few .NET
> applications. I am currently using expat to parse the output to ensure
> that it all works correcty.
That, unfortunately, probably implies that your implementation is almost
totally non-interoperable.
You should put out of your mind the notion of being "correct." Being
"correct" is pretty irrelevant if 80% of the requests that come from a VB.NET
client fail because Microsoft implemented part of their request differently
than what you interpreted as "correct."
The point is that "correctness" isn't the thing you need to aim for; what you
should aim for is interoperability with the important client implementations.
SOAP::Lite, .NET, probably some Java ones, C++ ones, and such.
Nobody does "correctness" testing; they do interoperability tests where they
try to submit requests to Apache AXIS, .NET, WebSphere, and the lot of other
important implementations. If you're testing a server (as is the case here),
then the point is to run tests with a bunch of clients.
Head to the SOAP::Lite and Axis projects; you'll see matrices describing this
sort of thing...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "ac.notelrac.teneerf@" "454aa"))
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/advocacy.html
"Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to using Windows
NT for mission-critical applications." --- What Yoda *meant* to say
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mlw | 2003-04-03 13:42:02 | Re: contrib and licensing |
Previous Message | mlw | 2003-04-03 12:50:16 | Re: contrib and licensing |