| From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |
| Date: | 2003-04-02 04:12:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200304020942.18320.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 07:19, you wrote:
> > Just switch to FreeBSD and use UFS ;)
>
> I must say, I found this whole discussion rather amusing on the
> sidelines given it's largely a non-problem for non-Linux users. :)
>
> "Better performance through engineering elegance."
Well, this may sound like a troll, but I have said this before and will say
that again. I found reiserfs to be faster than ext2, upto 40% at times when
we tried a quasi closed source benchmark on a quad xeon machine with SCSI
RAID.
Everything else being same and defaults used out of box, reiserfs on mandrake9
was far faster in every respect than ext2.
I personally find freeBSD UFS to be a better combo based on my workstation
tests. I believe freeBSD has a better IO scheuler that utilises disk
bandwidth in optimal manner. Scratching (my poor IDE) disk like mad does not
happen with freeBSD but linux does it plenty. But I didn't benchmark it for
throughput..
Shridhar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Kostyrka | 2003-04-02 15:13:19 | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |
| Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-04-02 01:49:06 | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |