| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tim Perdue <tim(at)perdue(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Status |
| Date: | 2003-04-01 00:23:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20030331202148.H5872@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
http://www.erserver.com is the newest, much improved, incarnation ... much
simpler installation and adminstration, and does multi-slave ...
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Tim Perdue wrote:
> I was using rserv about two years ago, but it wasn't terribly efficient.
> Has rserv or any other replication solution improved much?
>
> I would appreciate any opinions and links, as I'm not pulling up much
> recent info in the list search.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-01 01:24:30 | Re: System lockup |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-04-01 00:18:58 | Re: System lockup |