| From: | "Jason M(dot) Felice" <jfelice(at)cronosys(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | EXPLAIN ANALYZE in comparable units |
| Date: | 2003-03-28 20:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20030328204243.GH11198@argo.eraserhead.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm curious if anyone's considered adding logic to count actual disk/cache
hits to report for EXPLAIN ANALYZE so that we get a more apples-to-apples
comparison?
The other question is whether anyone has got scripts or tools or what not
for testing and getting accurate numbers for the following tuning variables:
random_page_cost
cpu_tuple_cost
cpu_index_tuple_cost
cpu_operator_cost
I've seen the code and the last one is pretty gross, but the first three
could definitely swing the optimizer, especially with the hardware I might
be getting ;-)
If noone has scripts, can anyone suggest how to implement.
-Jason
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2003-03-28 21:23:09 | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-28 20:27:34 | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |