Re: plpgsql compile failure

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql compile failure
Date: 2003-03-25 15:04:29
Message-ID: 200303251504.h2PF4Tf06725@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I am seeing the following plpgsql compile failure in CVS:
>
> > I'm seeing the same thing, and I also have bison 1.75.
>
> Considering how trivial the grammar change is, it's hard to call this
> anything except a bison bug. I'd be interested to know what causes it
> though --- is it worth trying to invent a workaround so people don't
> have to upgrade?

Not worth the effort -- email posted requiring 1.85.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-25 15:14:17 Bison 1.875 now required.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-25 15:03:57 Bison 1.85 now required