From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Arjen van der Meijden <acm(at)tweakers(dot)net> |
Cc: | "'scott(dot)marlowe'" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "'Randal L(dot) Schwartz'" <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |
Date: | 2003-03-24 19:39:37 |
Message-ID: | 200303241939.h2OJdbu06302@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] Namens scott.marlowe
> > Verzonden: maandag 24 maart 2003 19:26
>
> > Oh, and another thing. How do you do hot backups of a MySQL database
> > running Innodb tables? Better get out the checkbook for some closed
> > source software.
> Please elaborate what you see as a hot backup tool?
>
> Is that, for postgresql, the pg_dump tool? In that case, mysql has the
> same. Mysqldump works fine with innodb-tables as well as for myisam
> tables.
Can the database be active during the backup, read/writes? pg_dump can
do that, and make a consistent dump.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-03-24 20:00:04 | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-24 19:29:34 | Re: 4 billion + oids |