Re: timestamp/date in ecpg

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christoph Haller <ch(at)rodos(dot)fzk(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp/date in ecpg
Date: 2003-03-22 12:17:48
Message-ID: 20030322121748.GC21850@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 04:33:09PM +0100, Christoph Haller wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, maybe the transformation in the other direction is the culprit.
> > What I do is call ts1 = PGTYPEStimestamp_atot("2000-7-12 17:34:29",
> NULL); followed by a text = PGTYPEStimestamp_ttoa
> (ts1); Needless to say the resulting text is not "2000-7-12 17:34:29".
> :-(
> >
> I could not dig too deep into the code until now,
> but isn't there a leading zero missing
> 2000-07-12 17:34:29

Sure, but that shouldn't be a problem. Note, however, that I just ran a
short test that worked as advertized. Right now it seems ecpglib does
call the new functions incorrectly. When calling them directly it seems
to work. Unfortunately I have no time to dig into it right now. But I
surely will soon.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
ICQ: 179140304
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2003-03-22 15:12:08 Re: [HACKERS] Please clarify with regard to Renaming a Sequence
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-03-22 08:22:56 Re: Please clarify with regard to Renaming a Sequence