Re: 32/64-bit transaction IDs?

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 32/64-bit transaction IDs?
Date: 2003-03-22 18:25:59
Message-ID: 200303221125.59766.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Saturday March 22 2003 11:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> >
> > Again, the context is asyncronous trigger-based master-slave
> > replication ala contrib/dbmirror.
>
> AFAICS that technique does not need to worry about transaction ordering,
> as long as updates are sent in the order they are inserted into the
> pending-updates table... [snip]
>
> However, this may just move the problem somewhere else --- how will you
> be sure that you transmit entries in the update table in the correct
> order?

That is my question. How it is done now in dbmirror is by including the xid
and using a sequence object, essentially similar to

insert into queue (xid, tuple_id, data, ...)
values (GetCurrentTransactionId(), nextval('tuplesequence'), ...);

Actually, dbmirror does it in a couple of steps, but I think this is the
basic idea. So the queued tuple changes are groupable (and thus
replayable) by xid and order of queueing. Then the slave gets them in the
hopefully-correct order via

select ...
from queue q
where q.xid is in some appropriate range
order by xid asc, tuple_id asc;

Ed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-22 18:29:01 Re: 32/64-bit transaction IDs?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-22 18:05:13 Re: 32/64-bit transaction IDs?