Re: psql patch

Patch applied and attached. Thanks.

I had to modify the handling of cancelConn. It wasn't properly being
defined and set in the original patch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:35:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Cool; if you can do it that way then the wasted-cycles objection is
> > gone. (I don't think it would have been very interesting to implement
> > the functionality only in the no-readline case, 'cuz just about everyone
> > seems to use readline builds.)
>
> OK. I'm attaching my new patch (which is fixed for the bug in the
> previous attempt, and now touches a lot more code).
>
> After this, I'll get to work on introducing select(), and once that's
> finished we can start experimenting with asynchronous notification
> reports.
>
>
> Jeroen
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073