| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 04:30:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200303200430.h2K4UgV19094@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > > Vadim planned to implement the savepoints functionality
> > > > > using UNDO mechanism. AFAIR it was never denied explicitly.
> > > >
> > > > If you go to the TODO.detail/transactions archive, there was discussion
> > > > of using UNDO, and most felt that there were too many problems of having
> > > > to manage the undo system,
> > >
> > > This is closely related to the basics of PostgreSQL.
> > > Pleas don't decide it implicitly.
> >
> > We took a vote and UNDO lost --- do you want to do another vote?
>
> Sorry I missed the vote. Where is it ?
I can't find the vote in the archive. As I remember, Vadim and a few
others liked UNDO, while more liked the current approach.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 04:30:46 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2003-03-20 04:28:08 | Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff |