From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
Date: | 2003-03-20 04:14:01 |
Message-ID: | 200303200414.h2K4E1U17386@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Does the change worth the trouble ?
> > Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.
>
> If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.
>
> My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
> criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...
I think our policy is going to be that GUC backward compatibility
options have to be asked for during beta, unless it is obvious.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 04:14:43 | Re: string || NULL ambiguity |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-03-20 04:10:18 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |