Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode
Date: 2003-03-20 04:14:01
Message-ID: 200303200414.h2K4E1U17386@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Does the change worth the trouble ?
> > Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.
>
> If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.
>
> My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
> criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...

I think our policy is going to be that GUC backward compatibility
options have to be asked for during beta, unless it is obvious.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-20 04:14:43 Re: string || NULL ambiguity
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-03-20 04:10:18 Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode