From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Date: | 2003-03-18 22:18:02 |
Message-ID: | 200303182218.h2IMI2I13909@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > What if folks want all their connections autocommit off.
>
> For interactive use, people can record their preferred setting in
> ~/.psqlrc or something like that.
But that only works for psql, right? How would this be done at the
libpq level? Environment variables? GUC seems a whole lot cleaner.
> But any non-interactive program is written with a specific autocommit
> setting in mind. Either it assumes that single statements are
> automatically committed or it issues explicit COMMIT commands. That
> means, the choice of autocommit mode is always ultimately determined by
> the client, never by the server or its administrator.
>
> For that very reason most standard interfaces define in their
> specification whether applications must assume autocommit behavior or must
> not do so.
I understand. I just don't see any value in pushing that logic into
each client when we can do it centrally in the server.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL | 2003-03-18 22:19:47 | pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-03-18 22:06:21 | libpq's error messages not working as before |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-03-18 23:15:49 | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-03-18 22:03:26 | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |