From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ed Schaller <schallee(at)darkmist(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth |
Date: | 2003-03-18 01:49:09 |
Message-ID: | 200303180149.h2I1n9v11971@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I don't think any of that has changed, if that is what you are asking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Schaller wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> > OK, please let me know. Thanks.
>
> I haven't taken the time to check the current state of the
> authentication code and am relying on my old work on it. Would it be
> worth me taking the time to try to rework it in a better manner?
>
> >>>------>
>
> --
>
> +-------------+-----------------------+---------------+
> | Ed Schaller | Dark Mist Networking | psuedoshroom |
> +-------------+-----------------------+---------------+
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Reifschneider | 2003-03-18 07:18:41 | Re: Problem with RULE to update tables |
Previous Message | Ed Schaller | 2003-03-18 01:44:35 | Re: Bug #890: only one user per process in libpq with krb5 auth |