Re: DB archiving

From: Victor Yegorov <viy(at)pirmabanka(dot)lv>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DB archiving
Date: 2003-03-17 15:27:37
Message-ID: 20030317152737.GA12646@pirmabanka.lv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

* Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> [17.03.2003 16:49]:
> This is exactly the way pg_dump works. Essentially when you pg_dump, you
> get a "snapshot" of your database at the moment you start pg_dump. While
> other transaction can be occuring during your dump, the dump wont see
> them thanks to MVCC.
>

I see, thank you.

One more thing. I still cannot find any info on HOW pg_dump locks data it
is going to backup. Is this described somewhere in the manual? (I've found
nothing neither in "Concurency Control" nor in pg_dump description).

What I'd like is to understand the algorithm. I know how backuping is
realized in ORACLE, and I'm sure there, that when I start it, lock is set on
entire tablespace (it's put in readonly mode), so I'm shure, that nothing
will get there.

In PostgreSQL I don't know how lock is aquired. I'm trying to avoid
situations, like (assumption): lock is aquired on 'per table' level and
while first table in the list is locked, last one is being updated, so -
my db won't be consistent after backup.

Thanks in advance.

--

Victor Yegorov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ragnar Kjørstad 2003-03-17 15:31:48 Re: LVM snapshots
Previous Message Ragnar Kjørstad 2003-03-17 15:26:30 Re: LVM snapshots