| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | gearond(at)cvc(dot)net |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The folding of unquoted names to lower case in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-03-14 20:46:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200303142046.h2EKk6B24278@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Do you have as much trouble reading those all-uppercase queries as I do?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Gearon wrote:
> THAT explains why all that stuff is in UPPER case in ORACLE .... now I
> see their dastardly plan!
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>Any chance a patch to set a GUC for case folding would get applied?
> >
> >
> > Not really, because it would break everything in sight. (Hint: all the
> > system catalog names are lower-case ...)
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-14 20:49:29 | Re: The folding of unquoted names to lower case in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-03-14 20:44:09 | Re: Corrupted sequences |