| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4 |
| Date: | 2003-03-12 15:15:30 |
| Message-ID: | 200303121015.30713.lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 09:55, Robert Treat wrote:
> Personally I think Justin is a little off base with his criteria, since
> I see the FE/BE protocol changes as the real differentiator between an
> 8.0 and 7.4. Everyone is effected by a FE/BE protocol change, not nearly
> so many are effected by either win32 or PITR. And think of this crazy
> scenario: We release an 8.0 with PITR, then need either a 8.1 or a 9.0
> with a FE/BE overhaul, then need a possible 10.0 because we've added
> win32... yuk.
FWIW, the 6.4 protocol change didn't force a move from 6.3.2 to 7.0.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-12 15:34:57 | Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-03-12 15:14:01 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |