Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > One of the $64 questions that has to be answered is how much work we're
> > willing to expend on backwards compatibility. The path of least
> > resistance would be to handle it the same way we've done protocol
> > revisions in the past: the backend will be able to handle both old and
> > new protocols (so it can talk to old clients) but libpq would be revised
> > to speak only the new protocol (so new/recompiled clients couldn't talk
> > to old backends). We've gotten away with this approach in the past, but
> > the last time was release 6.4. I fully expect to hear more complaints
> > now.
>
> Personally ... as long as a v8.x client can talk to a v7.x backend, you
> have my vote ... I'm more apt to upgrade my clients before my servers
> anyway ...

Actually, it is usually the opposite, where old clients can talk to
newer servers, but not the reverse.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073