From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: almost there on a design |
Date: | 2003-03-03 20:54:17 |
Message-ID: | 20030303125126.V41677-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> 3/3/2003 10:25:12 AM, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>
> If I create the necessary fields first in this order, no deferrment seems necessary:
>
> I'm thinking about trying to create a user which only has access to selects and stored
> procedures, so the web interface can ONLY use functions which take place in a transaction and
> take care of it that way.
>
> create an email,
> create a usr
> create a usr email.
That'll work from a function (currently), but from straight commands,
if you make it such that there must be a usremailaddrs row to make a usr,
then the second will fail. If you try to make the usremailaddrs row
first, it fails due to the foreign key.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Munteanu Gabriel | 2003-03-03 21:46:39 | Re: wal-debug |
Previous Message | Cristian Custodio | 2003-03-03 20:53:45 | Array like a foreign key |