Re: almost there on a design

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: almost there on a design
Date: 2003-03-03 20:54:17
Message-ID: 20030303125126.V41677-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote:

> 3/3/2003 10:25:12 AM, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>
> If I create the necessary fields first in this order, no deferrment seems necessary:
>
> I'm thinking about trying to create a user which only has access to selects and stored
> procedures, so the web interface can ONLY use functions which take place in a transaction and
> take care of it that way.
>
> create an email,
> create a usr
> create a usr email.

That'll work from a function (currently), but from straight commands,
if you make it such that there must be a usremailaddrs row to make a usr,
then the second will fail. If you try to make the usremailaddrs row
first, it fails due to the foreign key.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Munteanu Gabriel 2003-03-03 21:46:39 Re: wal-debug
Previous Message Cristian Custodio 2003-03-03 20:53:45 Array like a foreign key