Re: 7.4?

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4?
Date: 2003-02-27 19:57:30
Message-ID: 20030227145730.M17141@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:00:50PM -0700, Ed L. wrote:
> stretch, but is a monstrous improvement. I'm assuming eRServer,
> rserv, or DBMirror maintains a proper transaction order, even if it's
> incomplete.

I dunno about dbmirror, but rserv and its bigger cousin both actually
apply the current-as-of-snapshot version of the row (which means that
if you have multiple changes to the same row, you needn't go through
all the iterations when applying the snapshot). I presume the same
is true of dbmirror, since it relies on the primary key.

> Sounds like PG-R + Spread is tackling that, too. I am learning that,
> if PG-R can work as advertised, it removes all my concerns about a
> syncronous system.

Yes, if it works as advertised, it'd be a _mighty sweet_ piece of
technology.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

  • Re: 7.4? at 2003-02-27 19:00:50 from Ed L.

Responses

  • Re: 7.4? at 2003-02-27 21:21:23 from Ed L.

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan 2003-02-27 20:05:57 Few Simple Questions
Previous Message Cornelia Boenigk 2003-02-27 19:57:12 Re: initdb hangs even though ipc-daemon is running?