From: | P G <pg_dba(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is the quickest query in the database? |
Date: | 2003-02-20 23:29:43 |
Message-ID: | 20030220232943.5185.qmail@web13310.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
That question sounds like one more of design or
architecture. Timing out the connection is one
solution. Another immediate idea comes to mind where
you can use a seperate thread or fork another process
allowing the rest of the application to continue if
needed.
Thanks.
--- Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> wrote:
> But, unless there is a timeout on that query, wont
> the system being down
> really hang you up, until your script reaches it's
> default timeout?
>
> We had this problem with PHP and Perl in the past.
> Is there a way to get
> around this in Java?
>
> - Ericson Smith
> eric(at)did-it(dot)com
>
> On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 15:32, P G wrote:
> > You are correct Steve Crawford. The query is used
> to
> > remotely test the connection to the db using JDBC.
> I
> > think, though, Jan Wieck provides the most
> valuable
> > solution so far. Any more thoughts, anyone?
> >
> > TIA.
> >
> > --- Steve Crawford
> <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > > It's academic. Set timing on in psql and run a
> bunch
> > > of tests. The variation
> > > from test to test is large enough to mask any
> > > difference between select 0 or
> > > select '' or select null.
> > >
> > > It would, however, be nice to know the reason
> for
> > > this query. I suspect it is
> > > to "ping" the server and making sure it is up by
> > > connecting and running a
> > > simple query with a known result. (Many colos
> have
> > > all sorts of setups for
> > > monitoring web servers but fewer for other
> services
> > > - setting up a "test"
> > > page on the web server that makes a request from
> the
> > > app server which, in
> > > turn, does a simple db query, all of which
> > > ultimately returns a standard
> > > string, say "system up", to the http request
> works
> > > quite well to set off
> > > alarm bells at the colo or even to allow a load
> > > balancer to take action).
> > >
> > > But I am surmising. What is the real reason for
> the
> > > query?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 11:52 am, Jonathan
> > > Bartlett wrote:
> > > > Might select NULL; be faster, since the number
> > > doesn't have to be parsed,
> > > > and null is probably a keyword?
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> > > > > Hi P G,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:52:07 -0800 (PST)
> > > > >
> > > > > P G <pg_dba(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > > What is the quickest and least intrusive
> query
> > > in the
> > > > > > database that will always succeed?
> > > > >
> > > > > select 1;
> > > > >
> > > > > :o)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Tino
> > > > >
> > > > > > select current_user;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- OR --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > select datname from pg_database where
> datname
> > > =
> > > > > > 'some_database';
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or would it be something else?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TIA.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators,
> tips,
> > > more
> > > > > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > > > > broadcast)--------------------------- TIP
> 3:
> > > if posting/reading through
> > > > > > Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > > subscribe-nomail command to
> > > > > > majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message
> > > can get through to the
> > > > > > mailing list cleanly
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
> please
> > > send an appropriate
> > > > subscribe-nomail command to
> > > majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > > > message can get through to the mailing list
> > cleanly
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
> --
> Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric B.Ridge | 2003-02-20 23:55:18 | Re: Fwd: REWRITE_INVOKE_MAX and "query may contain cycles" |
Previous Message | Medi Montaseri | 2003-02-20 23:29:25 | Re: What is the quickest query in the database? |