From: | "Patric Bechtel" <bechtel(at)ipcon(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: [Viruschecked] |
Date: | 2003-02-20 17:05:14 |
Message-ID: | 20030220170540.D622A475B47@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:02:06 -0700 (MST), scott.marlowe wrote:
Hi,
I doubt that it will be for "super-price-conscious" only. I recently
saw Western Digital annoucing a 10.000 RPM drive with 36 Gig for
serial ATA, <5.2ms access time, about 55 MB/s, for 30% than the SCSI price.
That's serious. Together with 5 years warranty and explicit statement
about being 24x7x365 capable (which most ATA-drives aren't!).
0.02$...
Patric
>> I'd see Serial ATA being a "serious challenger" if it allowed you to
>> cheaply build some "embarrassingly-parallel" RAID servers where you
>> were able to get 16 drives hooked up, each on its own ATA 'bus' for
>> about the price of 4-way SCSI.
>>
>> But the intended market is doubtless the super-price-conscious market,
>> which naturally leads to the overall quality of the results being
>> pretty compromised.
>These guys:
>will probably make use of serial ata, since they're already making some
>very nice, very fast IDE based RAID devices, and very dense (12 disk 3U
>units.)
PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 2636 F26E F523 7D62 4377 D206 7C68 06BB
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guy Fraser | 2003-02-20 17:07:01 | Re: arrays and pl/pgsql? |
Previous Message | Henrik Steffen | 2003-02-20 17:03:40 | reindex vs. drop index , create index |