| From: | Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: In 7.3.1, will I be able to reindex toast? |
| Date: | 2003-02-16 08:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200302160950.57788.mweilguni@sime.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am Samstag, 15. Februar 2003 16:49 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmm... how about pg_largeobject?
> > It seems to be treated like a system table, but I think it is not
> > necessary. Does the reindex command simply check the "pg_" prefix?
>
> As of 7.3, I believe it treats any table living in the pg_catalog schema
> as a system table. Certainly, a lot of these tables are not all that
> special and could be reindexed without going to standalone mode.
>
> It might be sufficient to insist on standalone reindexing just for the
> three or four tables that have nailed-in-cache indexes. I'm not sure
> though. Hiroshi, what do you think?
And what about adding a column "indissystem" to pg_index and setting this to true for system indexes, false otherwise?
Then there would be no need to hardwire the reindex logic.
Regards,
Mario Weilguni
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Colin Mangiagalli | 2003-02-16 10:02:35 | Transaction Logs Recycling Problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-16 05:41:04 | Re: Index not used with IS NULL |