From: | Andreas Schmitz <a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!! |
Date: | 2003-02-15 11:51:09 |
Message-ID: | 200302151251.09162.a.schmitz@cityweb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 14 February 2003 17:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Schmitz <a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de> writes:
> > I have a problem with the "vacuum full". every time I run the vacuum
> > command I loose data from the parent tables. maybe also from the
> > subtables (haven't checked yet). I tried it a few times up to now an I
> > can reproduce the phenomena.
>
> That sounds ugly ... but are you sure you don't have a hardware problem?
> I don't think anyone's ever reported such behavior before.
>
> If it is a Postgres bug, we can't do much to help you without a lot more
> detail.
>
> regards, tom lane
hi,
it does sound ugly. I checked the hardware. I can't see any problems with it.
I know, somestimes you need a lot of luck to see a CPU problem under solaris.
But I think the hardware is ok. however, what kind of details do you need to
qualify if it's a postgres problem or not ?
regards
-andreas schmitz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | daniel alvarez | 2003-02-15 13:14:42 | Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!! |
Previous Message | Pius Chan | 2003-02-14 21:16:16 | pg_restore fails when restoring a database view |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | daniel alvarez | 2003-02-15 13:14:42 | Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!! |
Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-15 08:36:39 | Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers |