From: | Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general(at)ipal(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | mailing list archives |
Date: | 2003-02-11 16:57:47 |
Message-ID: | 20030211105747.B17340@hamal.ipal.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I guess the mailing list archives are slow to keep up with the list itself?
I was having trouble getting mail on the list because it turns out the list
was delivered from a different mail server than the subscription confirms,
and it has a different name. I had postgresql.org whitelisted but I did not
have pgsql.com whitelisted, or even know about it. So I posted by earlier
and didn't see it come back. I checked the archives. Fixed the whitelist.
Got Tom Lane's reply and replied back. Still nothing in archives. So I do
not know if I missed any other replies.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| phil-nospam(at)ipal(dot)net | Texas, USA | http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-02-11 17:02:59 | Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-11 16:53:24 | Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 |