Re: to_date has beaten me...

From: Rodger Donaldson <rodgerd(at)diaspora(dot)gen(dot)nz>
To: Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: to_date has beaten me...
Date: 2003-02-06 09:19:03
Message-ID: 20030206091902.GA10995@diaspora.gen.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:06:35PM -0700, Roberto Mello wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:25:39PM +1300, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
> >
> > Why yes. Yes I did. Too much time spent with Oracle, evidently.
> > Next I'll be wondering why DECODE doesn't work...
>
> Because DECODE is non-standard AFAIK. You can use CASE WHEN in PostgreSQL,
> which IIRC, started being supported in Oracle 8.1.7.

It was a joke. A feeble one, I know. CASE actually turned up in
8.1.6 - I ended up rewriting a chunk of a client's codebase, mostly
because DECODE is so illegible next to CASE.

--
Rodger Donaldson rodgerd(at)diaspora(dot)gen(dot)nz
I just had this vision of a young boy cowering in terror, whispering:
"I see dumb people"
-- Steve VanDevender

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Haller 2003-02-06 09:51:21 Re: Lock timeout detection in postgres 7.3.1
Previous Message Roberto Mello 2003-02-06 05:06:35 Re: to_date has beaten me...