Re: PGP signing releases

From: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
To: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases
Date: 2003-02-05 17:40:34
Message-ID: 20030205174034.GA2536@ping.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 06:19:42PM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
>
> I do agree that a checksum (or hash) is better than nothing, however, a
> serious security solution it is not.

Which really is all I'm saying.

Kurt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Hubbard 2003-02-05 17:52:16 Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2003-02-05 17:39:31 Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS