Re: PGP signing releases

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases
Date: 2003-02-05 16:45:57
Message-ID: 20030205164557.GA2542@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 15:22:12 +0900,
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2003, Greg Copeland wrote:
>
> Hm. Splitting the key into parts is a very interesting idea, but I'd
> be interested to know how you might implement it without requiring
> everybody to be physically present at signing.

The simple way to do this is to make it known to the community that
postgresql releases should be signed by at least X of the developers.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-05 16:49:56 Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2003-02-05 16:40:12 Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS