Fwd: Postgresql

From: Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Fwd: Postgresql
Date: 2003-02-03 13:51:04
Message-ID: 200302031351.04860.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi folks,

This was posted to one of the redhat lists and it got me thinking.

I would imagine that there is some sort of limit otherwise stale connections
could be left hanging around forever. However, PHP supports persistant
connections where it can go days without anyone accessing a page.

So what is the answer to the question below?

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

Subject: Postgresql
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:10:53 -0600
From: "Delao, Darryl W" <ddelao(at)ou(dot)edu>
To: "'redhat-list(at)redhat(dot)com'" <redhat-list(at)redhat(dot)com>

Anyone know if postgres has a connections limit by default? I see a
connections limit in my conf file but it is commented out..Just curious what
the default limit is, if any.

Darryl

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request(at)redhat(dot)com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-------------------------------------------------------

--
Gary Stainburn

This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-03 14:25:59 Re: LWLock acquire - can't wait without a proc structure
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2003-02-03 11:35:57 Re: Database Management Setup