From: | will trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PG Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: List online archives and spam |
Date: | 2003-02-03 10:36:10 |
Message-ID: | 20030203103610.GB3543@mail.serensoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:33:51AM +0100, B. van Ouwerkerk wrote:
> If you can run procmail then that's your best bet. Take a look at
> spamassasin, seems to do a proper job..
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
SUBJECT_IS_LIST,USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK
version=2.44
this is what spamassassin adds to your incoming email. makes it
very easy to spot spam. and has very few false positives.
when it's a really bonafide suspect (much higher score) you can
see lots more tests plus it changes the subject so yuo can tell
at a glance that it's spam.
the above sample status is from the very message i'm replying
to.
so, you use outlook? eesh! :)
--
There are 10 kinds of people:
ones that get binary, and ones that don't.
will(at)serensoft(dot)com
http://sourceforge.net/projects/newbiedoc -- we need your brain!
http://www.dontUthink.com/ -- your brain needs us!
Looking for a firewall? Do you think smoothwall sucks? You're
probably right... Try the folks at http://clarkconnect.org/ !
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | B. van Ouwerkerk | 2003-02-03 12:08:04 | Re: List online archives and spam |
Previous Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2003-02-03 10:27:05 | Re: DBI driver and transactions |