Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork?
Date: 2003-02-03 01:09:23
Message-ID: 200302030109.h1319N506946@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I don't think I was clear before. When someone is looking at the
interactive docs, I would like them to say, "Oh, there's a comment. I
better read that in case it will help me." If we have old comments,
their "special" value becomes diminished. That's why I think they
should be removed as they are reviewed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Conway [mailto:neilc(at)samurai(dot)com]
> > Sent: 02 February 2003 20:52
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interactive Documentation - how do you
> > want it towork?
> >
> > > 2) Bearing in mind your answer to the previous question, should all
> > > the comments be deleted when useful examples have been
> > merged into the
> > > main documents (remember that the definition of 'useful'
> > may vary), or
> > > should we only remove the 'junk' ones?
> >
> > Once the comment's suggestion has been incorporated and the
> > docs updated, I think it should be removed. Just like in the
> > rest of the documentation, there's no point presenting
> > duplicate content to the user, so we should only keep the
> > idocs comments that are still relevant. The same goes for
> > comments that have no value (e.g. support requests).
>
> My concern here is that what (for example) Bruce decides is not a useful
> addition to the docs themselves, maybe something that would have helped
> me with some bizarre problem. If we dump *all* the docs after they have
> been merged then I might lose that helpful tip.
>
> Also, and perhaps more importantly, the comments will be merged into a
> *future* version. If I am running 7.2, I'm going to look at the 7.2
> docs, not 7.3.
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2003-02-03 01:37:38 Re: pg_hba.conf hostmask.
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2003-02-03 01:03:20 Re: PGP signing releases